vrgoilpipeline http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com VRG Year 1 Project 2011: English and Social StudiesBlog space for image analysis and digital media analysis.Topic: Oil pipeline in North America posterous.com Mon, 12 Dec 2011 01:00:23 -0800 Digital Media Analysis http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/digital-media-analysis-66816 http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/digital-media-analysis-66816

Digital Media Analysis by Sofia, Ebba H. and Linnea

Richard Walls and Jeanette Clayton’s group

Three different sources from YouTube, a blog and TransCanada’s official website argue for different perspectives about the Keystone XL pipeline. The YouTube source presents three different environmentally active people and they explain the negative effects the pipeline will have on the environment, such as the increased carbon dioxide level. Mike Tidwell, founder and director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network claims that saying no to the KXL could mean that “finally we're turning a corner on our dirty energy addiction"(Mike Tidwell, 2011). TransCanada believes that KXL is too important for the economy. The U.S.A. uses five million barrels of oil more than they import per day. The crude oil is a very important energy source for the US and the oil pipeline would secure the country’s oil supply (TransCanada, 2011). A conservative blog written by a majoring in advanced conservative studies discusses how the KXL is important to provide jobs (Conservative Blogs Central, 2011).

The YouTube clip is angled the way it is because the participants are environmental workers and one of them comes from Wisconsin that is severely affected by climate changes and does not want to become worse (Mike Tidwell, 2011). TransCanada are affected by the fact that they are working with KXL pipelines, they have already produced material that is needed and it would therefore be a waste of money to throw it away (TransCanada, 2011). The blogger’s ideology is affecting the perspective of the text by having other political opinions than Obama (Conservative Blogs Central, 2011). All of the sources are only arguing for their own opinion and do not include other perspectives. The people presented in the sources are well education in their own area. However, they do not have enough knowledge of the other parts fields to make an un biased statement.   

It was easier to find arguments against the KXL pipeline because the media provides the demonstrators more attention. The environmental questions are a sensitive matter since it is a very central question. Moreover, the possible applicants for the jobs are not being heard but only governmental people speaking for them. Because of moral reasons scattered parts of the society that need employment may deny the jobs. This is neither brought up in the media. In conclusion, it is difficult to be un objective in the KXL discussion since the options includes a strong stand point.  

                                                                                                           

      Sources  

The blog

http://conservativeblogscentral.blogspot.com/2011/11/obama-cares-about-re-election-while.html

The YouTube clip

The official website

http://www.transcanada.com/keystone.html

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:58:46 -0800 Image analysis http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/image-analysis-76367 http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/image-analysis-76367

Image Analysis

The picture is a press photo and the people in the photo are sitting outside the White House demonstrating against the Keystone XL pipeline. It conveys the disagreement the oil pipeline has created between the government and the people.

Centered in the image is a girl holding a sign which indicates that she and the other people are demonstrating together. The demonstrators are dressed casually which inclines that they are civilians, and their postures inclines that it is a peaceful demonstration. This is a contemporary picture that was taken before winter in the U.S. As a result of the crowd’s light clothing it is possible to make this assumption. The picture is shot from the ground looking up and is capturing the girl with the sign in the center. Depth is conveyed with the White House in the background and the distance between it and the demonstrators. The photo is cropped to give the impression of a large amount of people. As a consequence, it is believed that more people are outside of the picture sitting on the ground along the sides.

The photograph conveys peace and calm by their body language and rebellion by the sign and that they are sitting in front of a governmental buildning and positivity by the sunshine on the crowd’s faces and excluding the White House with its shadow. The crowd is representing a strong unit fighting, despite the fact that the people are of different ages. Due to the fact that the picture is shot in front of the White House it conveys that it is a political demonstration. The gap between the White House and the crowd with the fence parting the people from the political power shows the disagreement between the two parts. In addition, the picture shows the difficulties for the people having an impact on the political system. What is not shown in the picture is the possibility of politicians trying to defend themselves and the amount of people being present. As a result of the picture not including governmental workers the picture is portrayed as only viewing the perspective of the people. This picture was taken when the demonstrators gathered to show their discontentment with the Keystone XL pipe line. The message is projecting the rejection of the KXL pipe line and that there is a disagreement between the government and the people.

Sofia, Linnea, Ebba

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Sun, 11 Dec 2011 12:48:29 -0800 Picture Analysis Richard & Jeanettes Group http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/picture-analysis-richard-jeanettes-group http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/picture-analysis-richard-jeanettes-group
Picture Analysis.docx Download this file

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Sun, 11 Dec 2011 12:47:21 -0800 Media Analysis Richard & Jeanettes group http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/media-analysis-richard-jeanettes-group http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/media-analysis-richard-jeanettes-group
Media Analysis.docx Download this file

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:08:02 -0800 Untitled http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/84805658 http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/84805658
media.docx Download this file

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Fri, 09 Dec 2011 06:58:37 -0800 Amelia Lembke, Leopold Henrikson, Hanna Jensen-Torp http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/amelia-lembke-leopold-henrikson-hanna-jensen http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/amelia-lembke-leopold-henrikson-hanna-jensen
Digital Media Analysis.docx Download this file

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Fri, 09 Dec 2011 06:33:51 -0800 Untitled http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/84793772 http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/84793772
Digital media analysis.docx Download this file

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Fri, 09 Dec 2011 06:32:22 -0800 Image analysis http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/image-analysis-49636 http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/image-analysis-49636
Bildanalys.docx Download this file

Teachers: Alexandra Koumi, Martin Musgrove

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Fri, 09 Dec 2011 06:28:54 -0800 Untitled http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/84791897 http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/84791897
Digital media analysis, Keystone XL.docx Download this file

Martin Musgrove & Alexandra Koumi

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Fri, 09 Dec 2011 06:04:25 -0800 Untitled http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/84782709 http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/84782709
Digital media analysis.docx Download this file

Ann Wachmeister and Alexandra Koumi

By Sofia Boman, Jarik Bulavko and Josefin Klarin

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Fri, 09 Dec 2011 05:59:43 -0800 Digital Media analysis http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/digital-media-analysis-79571 http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/digital-media-analysis-79571

Digital Media analysis

 

Different views on the Keystone XL Pipeline

 

The three sources we have chosen consist of an objective article from BBC, a YouTube-film featuring Bill McKibben who is against the Keystone XL and lastly an informative text pro the pipeline, written by the company behind it, TransCanada. BBC News gives an objective view, with strictly informative writing. In the article from BBC about the project they discuss the issue from different opinions and facts. The video of Bill McKibben and TransCanada’s press text are far more subjective, displaying clear, sometimes radical opinions.

 

TransCanada is the company proposing to build the pipeline through North America, and therefor they have much to gain financially from the project. This shows clearly in their text, as they do not raise any negative concerns about the environment and only stress the positive outcomes such as the jobs this project will create. TransCanada are also very withdrawn about mentioning their own financial possibilities compared to the opportunities to restore the stability of the American economy.

 

In contrast to the economical and job summoning possibilities, environmental activists claim there is a major threat to the climate of the world and the obstructed nature life of the US. Bill McKibben an environmentalist fighting against the Keystone XL so badly that he has already been sent to jail for summoning a protest surrounding the white house. He propagates passionately for the terrible outcomes that might occur on our planet and the US if this pipeline is built and Canada keeps working on the oil sands. He cites Jim Hansen, expert at NASA, saying that exploiting the Canadian oil sands would result in a “game over” for the environment.

 

These media sources do not only feature different focuses, they also find different angles on the same points. Whilst TransCanada claims the building of the pipeline would create 13 000 jobs and 118 000 “spin-off jobs”, McKibben predicts fewer jobs and claims the construction jobs are only temporary. According to him and his fellow activists, the purpose of a pipeline is making transport of oil easier, and human work unnecessary.

 

The reasons these sources argue against each other are mostly due to ideological and financial differences. TransCanada has an obvious conflict of interest, since the approval of their pipeline would mean a blossoming billion-dollar industry. McKibben on the other hand has practically nothing to gain personally from his protests. His only motive is his passion for our planet.

 

Karoline Hermansson, Douglas Persson and Bianca Merckling

 

 

Reference List:

BBC News (08/11 2011) “State department faces Keystone XL review”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-15631968

(Accessed on 9 December 2011)

 

TransCanada Corporation (18/11 2011) “Key Projects, Oil Pipelines, Keystone Pipeline Project”

http://transcanada.com/keystone.html

(Accessed on 9 December 2011)

 

 

Democracy Now (23/08 2011) “Bill McKibben: Why I Spent 2 Days in Jail Protesting the Keystone XL Tar Sands Oil Pipeline”

(Accessed on 9 December)

 

 

Deborah and Christina’s group

Karoline Hermansson, Douglas Persson and Bianca Merckling

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Fri, 09 Dec 2011 05:19:18 -0800 Digital Media Analysis http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/digital-media-analysis-75525 http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/digital-media-analysis-75525

Richard Walls & Christina McKay

The company behind the Keystone Xl pipeline, Trans Canada corp., has written a post on their website on how the keystone pipeline will create jobs and opportunities for a lot of people through-out USA. In their article Trans Canada claim to be able to create 7000 new jobs in the manufacturing process, and another 118000 spin-off jobs. The article never mentions any negative views on the pipeline. This is because Trans Canada is the company behind the pipeline and of course, they want it to look good.

As our second source, we found an article on the Greenpeace website, arguing against the pipeline. Greenpeace mentions that the use of oil in USA has declined the last years, rendering an oil pipeline obsolete. Greenpeace is opposed to the pipeline because of their bias to solve the environmental crisis.

Lastly, we chose a neutral source, the Guardian from the UK. They are a respectable source of news and report the news unbiased. Seeing as they are situated in the UK, it is even more certain that they will not present any opinions since the pipeline does not affect UK directly. The Guardian’s report on the pipeline presented both positive and negative effects of the pipeline. They mentioned that the pipeline will create jobs and also that Canada is a neighbour of USA and they are closely related, which would make the oil “ethical” as they put it in the article. The Guardian also mentioned the negative effects, such as the decline of oil use in the USA, but also the risks of the pipeline. An older pipeline, called just “keystone” has had 14 leaks in just a year.

It becomes quite clear that the same news story can be told from different perspectives. If you were to only read the article from Trans Canada you would think that the pipeline is one of the best-proposed projects in a long time. While if you were to only read the Greenpeace article the pipeline is just a waste of money and a strain on the environment. The different sources are not lying; they are just choosing not to tell the entire truth and choose arguments that will gain their opinion. The Guardian is very clearly neutral, they present the positive effects and the negative effects and lets the reader decide on their opinion.

Reference list:

Greenpeace, 2011. U.S Gasoline Use Declining. [online] (13 October 2011) avaliable at: <http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/news-and-blogs/campaign-blog/usgasoline-use-declining-keystone-xl-pipeline/blog/37320/ >[Acessed 9 December 2011].



The Guardian UK, 2011. Q&A: Keystone XL oil pipeline. [online] (4 November 2011) Avaliable at: <http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/nov/04/qa-keystone-xl-oil-pipeline

> [Acessed 9 December 2011].

TransCanada, 2011. [online] (18 November 2011) Avaliable at: <http://www.transcanada.com/keystone.html> [Acessed 9 December 2011]

Jakob Wedenborn, Camilla Bratt Forss & Astrid Andersson

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Fri, 09 Dec 2011 04:59:36 -0800 Digital Media Anlysis http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/digital-media-anlysis http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/digital-media-anlysis
To Christina McKay and Richard Walls

The Keystone XL Pipeline Project – Digital Media Analysis

 

     The Keystone XL project involves the construction of a transcontinental oil pipeline from the tar sand fields of Alberta in Canada to the port of Houston on the Gulf of Mexico. Which purpose the project has is to provide a cost efficient transport system for the oil produced from the tar sands found in Alberta. As the project is controversial, there has been a lot of debate around its political, environmental, economic and regional security implications. The perspectives and opinions vary between different stakeholders depending on the ideology, political background and how each group is personally affected by the project. Below the analysis will discuss the views of the project from an environmental, conservative and national affair columnist’s perspective.

 

     Among conservatives, the main issues are access to cheap oil, creation of job opportunities and national energy security. Political ideology is the most important factor explaining the views of this group. They see the US as an independent nation that should never have to rely on any foreign nation in any material respect. That is why they support the project. Environmental concerns are only seen as absurd expressions of the Obama administration.

 

     The views of the conservatives are the complete opposite of those of the environmentalist groups who see many risks associated with the project. Among these are increased greenhouse emissions, the dirty extracting of oil from tar sands and the risk of oil spills from the pipeline. The reason why their believes differ from the conservatives is that they take a more global and responsible view of the role of the US in the world. This group also tense to be a well educated and over represented on the east and west coast. 

 

     A national affairs columnist naturally needs to be objective in his writing and not be bound by any particular ideology as compared with the two sources above. He focuses on the national political scene and the decisions made by their nations political leaders.  Most politicians are relatively indifferent and are able to see both benefits and disadvantages of the project. They see the positive benefits of job creation, energy security and other benefits. At the same time they need to consider the opinions of the people to not upset their voters. 

 

     To analyze any given text it is critical to fully understand the background, ideology and the self-interest of the particular stakeholder. This is evident in the examples described above.

 

 

 

 

Simpson J, 2011. Pipeline-altering Lessons . [online] (16 November 2011) Available at: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/jeffrey-simpson/pipeline-altering-lessons/article2237344/ [Accessed 8 December 2011]

 

Macquain B, 2011. Energy Security and the Keystone XL Pipeline. [online] (25 August 2011) Available at: http://www.conservativecommune.com/2011/08/energy-security-and-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/ [Accessed 8 December 2011]

 

 

Stemwell O, 2011. Valparaiso University Fights the Keystone XL Pipeline. [online] (4 November 2011) Available at: http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/news-and-blogs/campaign-blog/valparaiso-university-fights-the-keystone-xl-/blog/37680/ [Accessed 9 Decemeber 2011]

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Fri, 09 Dec 2011 04:57:20 -0800 Oil Pipeline http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/oil-pipeline-3052 http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/oil-pipeline-3052
Richard Walls and Christina Mckay

Image Analysis

http://www.conservativecommune.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Keystone-XL-pipeline.png   

The conservatory, Mcquain B., 2011 Energy Security and the Keystone XL Pipeline

     

     The citizens are concerned for which consequences the pipeline may occur; meanwhile some of the politicians try to calm the people by showing the benefits of the project. The photograph is taken from the conservative commune´s website. They are positive and advocate the benefits of the pipeline and claim that it will create new construction and manufacturing jobs and an eco-friendly oil transportation. Besides this, it will also improve the energy security in the US. The positive atmosphere is strengthened by the bright blue sky which clarifies the pipelines harmless impact on the environment. In addition to this, there is also obvious that by putting the workers in the center, the photographer intend to show that the project will result in many new job opportunities. As the picture only shows the benefits of the project the picture appears one-sided.

     

     The one-sided appearance hides the many disadvantages with the project. Although the project will create new job opportunities, which will affect the economy in a positive way, the majority of these jobs are only temporary during the building-process. The pipeline itself may not affect the environment in a direct way.  Indirectly the extraction of the oil will release the double amount of greenhouse gases compared to ordinary oil extraction, since it is extracted from tar sand. This will aggravate the greenhouse effect even more. Another disadvantage is how the route is planed to cross sensitive aquifers in Nebraska, which provides drinking water for the inhabitants. If the pipeline may break it could end up in a huge catastrophe. The question is, why did the photographer choose to show only the positive side of the project?

     

      Similar to a coin this project will equal both advantages and disadvantages, and not just benefits as the image shows. The intension of this picture is to overshadow all the negative consequences and only let the positive benefits influence the citizens´ opinions. To try to convince the people by hiding the disadvantages may be a winning, but an ugly concept to carry through the project and their will.

Mcquain,B., 2011.Energy Security and the Keystone XL Pipeline. [electronic print] Available at: <http://www.conservativecommune.com/2011/08/energy-security-and-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/> [Accessed 8 December 2011]

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Fri, 09 Dec 2011 04:52:32 -0800 Digital Media Analysis http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/digital-media-analysis http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/digital-media-analysis

                              Digital Media Analysis by Sofia, Ebba H. and Linnea

Richard Walls and Jeanette Clayton’s group

Three different sources from YouTube, a blog and TransCanada’s official website argue for different perspectives about the Keystone XL pipeline. The YouTube source presents three different environmentally active people and they explain the negative effects the pipeline will have on the environment, such as the increased carbon dioxide level. Mike Tidwell, founder and director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network claims that saying no to the KXL could mean that “finally we're turning a corner on our dirty energy addiction"(Mike Tidwell, 2011). TransCanada believes that KXL is too important for the economy. The U.S.A. uses five million barrels of oil more than they import per day. The crude oil is a very important energy source for the US and the oil pipeline would secure the country’s oil supply (TransCanada, 2011). A conservative blog written by a majoring in advanced conservative studies discusses how the KXL is important to provide jobs (Conservative Blogs Central, 2011).

The YouTube clip is angled the way it is because the participants are environmental workers and one of them comes from Wisconsin that is severely affected by climate changes and does not want to become worse (Mike Tidwell, 2011). TransCanada are affected by the fact that they are working with KXL pipelines, they have already produced material that is needed and it would therefore be a waste of money to throw it away (TransCanada, 2011). The blogger’s ideology is affecting the perspective of the text by having other political opinions than Obama (Conservative Blogs Central, 2011). All of the sources are only arguing for their own opinion and do not include other perspectives. The people presented in the sources are well education in their own area. However, they do not have enough knowledge of the other parts fields to make an un biased statement.   

It was easier to find arguments against the KXL pipeline because the media provides the demonstrators more attention. The environmental questions are a sensitive matter since it is a very central question. Moreover, the possible applicants for the jobs are not being heard but only governmental people speaking for them. Because of moral reasons scattered parts of the society that need employment may deny the jobs. This is neither brought up in the media. In conclusion, it is difficult to be un objective in the KXL discussion since the options includes a strong stand point.   

                                                                                                           

      Sources   

The blog

http://conservativeblogscentral.blogspot.com/2011/11/obama-cares-about-re-election-while.html

The YouTube clip

The official website

http://www.transcanada.com/keystone.html

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:24:40 -0800 Josefin, Sofia & Jarik. Image analysis http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/josefin-sofia-jarik-image-analysis http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/josefin-sofia-jarik-image-analysis
image analyses.docx Download this file

Hello! 

Our group misunderstood where we should put in our "Image analysis". We thought it should be in the "group page", but we realized it was wrong.
Hope it is okay. 

Teachers: Ann & Alexandra 

All best.

Jarik Bulavko

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://posterous.com/images/profile/missing-user-75.png http://posterous.com/users/cONlPSSGPW5OW jarik123 jarik123 jarik123
Thu, 08 Dec 2011 08:03:28 -0800 Image analysis http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/image-analysis-43178 http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/image-analysis-43178
Image analysis.docx Download this file

Hanna Jensen-Torp, Leopold Henrikson, Amelia Lembke

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Thu, 08 Dec 2011 07:21:53 -0800 Untitled http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/84611143 http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/84611143 Sorry that our hand in is late. We couldn't find what address we were supposed to send it to.

Northern Pipeline Demostation.docx Download this file

/Helena, Madeleine and William

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Thu, 08 Dec 2011 07:15:07 -0800 Image Analysis http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/image-analysis-44542 http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/image-analysis-44542
Image Analysis final.docx Download this file

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
Thu, 08 Dec 2011 07:12:52 -0800 Image Analysis http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/image-analysis-82228 http://vrgoilpipeline.posterous.com/image-analysis-82228
Image Analysis.docx Download this file

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>